<address id="zrlhv"><cite id="zrlhv"><video id="zrlhv"></video></cite></address>
<cite id="zrlhv"></cite>
<menuitem id="zrlhv"></menuitem>
<var id="zrlhv"></var>
<cite id="zrlhv"></cite>
<menuitem id="zrlhv"><dl id="zrlhv"></dl></menuitem>
<var id="zrlhv"><dl id="zrlhv"></dl></var>
CHN强国网下载APP
犯我中华者 虽远必诛

印度比中国强大吗,印网友:中国GDP远超印度GDP

2019-04-21 10:35:25 | 来源:三泰虎 | 参与: 0

  Is India stronger than China?(3)

  印度比中国强大吗?(3)

  Quora读者的评论:

  Shreekanth Prabhu

  Originally Answered: Who is stronger, India or China?

  Economically if you go by the size of GDP, China has 4 times that of India (at least). But per-capita income-wise China is not in the league of developed nations. China also has lot of poor people. . Again Militarily China is stronger and it has made greater progress in manufacturing itself. India has many Corporations which can be global companies on their own. China essentially has been a value-adder. India has greater head-room to show its mettle in research as well. India needs to play to its strength. If India can get rid of its legacy systems and mind-set India can lead.

  最初的问题是?#26680;?#26356;强大,印度还是中国?

  从经济上看,如果按GDP规模计算,中国GDP至少是印度GDP的4倍。但就人均收入而言,中国并不在发达国家之列。中国也有很多穷人。中国军事更加强大,在制造业方面也取得了更大的进步。印度有很多可?#36828;?#31435;成为全球性公司的公司。印度有更大的空间来展示它在研究方面的实力。印度需要发挥自己的优势。如果印度能摆脱其历史遗留问题?#36864;?#32500;定势,印度就能领?#21462;?/p>

  Vdhay Kumar N, Consultant at Oil and Gas Industry (2017-present)

  Is India stronger than China?

  thanks for A2A

  Strength is just a perspective, England is so small and with limited population and monarchy but you can remember how it played a big role in colonization and world history.

  Russia and USA, they too with minimum population are so much forward and protect their very long borders with available manpower.

  Hope India will go ahead with more of works and not words.

  印度比中国强大吗?

  谢谢你提?#25910;?#20010;问题。

  实力只是一个视角,英国弹丸之地,人口有限,还是君主政体,但你还记得它曾在殖民和世界历史上扮演过非常重要的角色吧。

  俄罗斯和美国,他们也是人口很少的国家,可他们远远超过我们,能用可动用的人力保护他们很长的边界。

  希望印度继续干实事,不要假大空。

\

  Akshay Rathore, IFS(PROBATION) at MP Forest Department (2018-present)

  Originally Answered: China or India, who is stronger?

  Economically china's GDP is far more than india's. Social and health indicators viz infant mortality rate , maternal mortality rates , life expectancy, human development index value , proportion of poor's etc. Politically China is permanent member of UN security council so he has special veto power which India has not. Strategically and militarily China has upper hand in both conventional and unconventional warheads. So right now India is not at par with China. But we can because of our favourable demography and resources.

  最初的问题是:中国和印度,谁更强大?

  经济上,中国的GDP远远超过印度。社会急卫生指标包括婴儿死亡率、孕产妇死亡率、预期寿命、人类发展指数、?#29420;?#20154;口比例?#21462;?#25919;治上,中国是联合国安理会常?#21355;?#20107;国,所以他拥有印度没有的特别否决权。在战略和军事上,中国在常规?#22836;?#24120;规弹头上都处于优势。所以现在印度还不能跟中国平起平坐。但由于我们有人口和资?#20174;?#21183;,我们总有一天会赶超中国。

  Sulav Karki

  Originally Answered: Who is more powerful between India and China?

  It’s a relative question. Both India and China are huge Countries with more than a billion people, Both have large armies although China has more and is more advanced and Both have nuclear weapons. India and China have actually fought already back in 1962 in which India lost but if a full fledged invasion were to happen, i don’t think there would be any clear winners and all losers. Economically, of course China is more powerful than India, in terms of military as well China is more powerful.

  最初的问题是:中印之间谁更强大?

  这是一个相对的问题。印度和中国都是拥有10亿多人口的大国,?#21152;?#26377;庞大的军队,尽管中国拥有更多、更先进的武器,而且?#21152;?#26377;核武器。印度和中国?#23548;?#19978;早在1962年就已经打过仗了,当时印度输了,但如果全面入侵发生,我不认为会有明显的赢家和输家。在经济上,中国?#27604;?#27604;印度更强大,在军事上,中国也更强大。

  Yoginder Sharma, former War veteran- lost leg in 71; later GOC in C. at Indian Army (1955-1994)

  Sure, for an Indian, India must always seem stronger and better.

  But, seriously, how does one compare 'relative-strengths’ of the two most populous countries in the world? Is it a straight-line mathematical count of Military strengths. In that respect, China wins!

  But, in the nuclear context, that is a simplistic way! Beyond the minimum-deterrence and assured second-strike capability, nuclear build-up is an overkill. Both are thus evenly balanced, by that bottom-line nuclear criteria!

  At the geo-strategic level China has made a huge headway in the fields of Infrastructural development, cyber warfare, strategic-reserves and power-projection, and in its Complete National Power!

  In all these, it is already in the super-power league, while we are still a developing regional power. However, a Sino-Indian conflict cannot remain contained, it will escalate into a global conflict, hence the importance of creating countervailing alliances.

\

  ?#27604;唬?#23545;于一个印度人来说,印度必须永远看起来更强大、更好。

  但是,严肃地说,如何比较世界上人口最多的两个国?#19994;?ldquo;相对优势”?这是对军事力量的线性数学计算吗?如果是那样的话,中国赢了!

  但是,在核环境中,这是一种简单的方式!除了最低限度的威慑和确保的二次打击能力之外,建立核设施是一种滥杀滥伤。因此,根据核标准的底线,两者都是不相上下的!

  从地缘战略高度看,中国在基础设施建设、网络战、战?#28304;?#22791;、力量建设等领域取得了巨大进展,国家实力不断增强。

  在所有这些方面,中国已经是超级大国,而我们仍然是一个发展中地区大国。然而,中印冲突无法得到控制,它将升级为全球冲突,因此建立制衡联盟非常重要。

  Anonymous

  Yes, I give a example.

  是?#27169;?#25105;举个例?#21360;?/p>

  

正在加载

精彩阅读

热点?#21028;?/h5>
  • 日?#21028;?/li>
  • 周?#21028;?/li>
评论?#21028;?/h5>
  • 周?#21028;?/li>
  • 月?#21028;?/li>

--> 什么品牌的篮球好

<address id="zrlhv"><cite id="zrlhv"><video id="zrlhv"></video></cite></address>
<cite id="zrlhv"></cite>
<menuitem id="zrlhv"></menuitem>
<var id="zrlhv"></var>
<cite id="zrlhv"></cite>
<menuitem id="zrlhv"><dl id="zrlhv"></dl></menuitem>
<var id="zrlhv"><dl id="zrlhv"></dl></var>

<address id="zrlhv"><cite id="zrlhv"><video id="zrlhv"></video></cite></address>
<cite id="zrlhv"></cite>
<menuitem id="zrlhv"></menuitem>
<var id="zrlhv"></var>
<cite id="zrlhv"></cite>
<menuitem id="zrlhv"><dl id="zrlhv"></dl></menuitem>
<var id="zrlhv"><dl id="zrlhv"></dl></var>
必赢客时时彩专业版 河南22选5历史号码 草居士大乐透预则 竞彩篮球大小分技 体彩竞彩篮球胜分差 真人龙虎斗怎么看路子 棒球服搭配 买彩票的都醒醒吧 广快乐十分开奖走势图 时时彩走势图老时时彩 安徽时时彩开彩结果查询 百乐坊娱乐城可信吗 博彩网年一肖一码中特码 七星彩 江苏体彩e球彩走势图